<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICSI Netalyzr &#8211; Know your Connection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/</link>
	<description>Freeware reviews and downloads, featuring the coolest, best free software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:29:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: elwoode</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-256863</link>
		<dc:creator>elwoode</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 13:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freewaregenius.com/?p=4715#comment-256863</guid>
		<description>I tried running it and it just crashed my firefox (3.6)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried running it and it just crashed my firefox (3.6)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JCR</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-256781</link>
		<dc:creator>JCR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 12:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freewaregenius.com/?p=4715#comment-256781</guid>
		<description>This test must be done with your firewall OFF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This test must be done with your firewall OFF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason H</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-256675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freewaregenius.com/?p=4715#comment-256675</guid>
		<description>I too have been investigating DNS for a post. Google Public DNS (though lacking many features) beat OpenDNS in 3 different environments where I tested it, but lacks any of the features beyond the infrastructure. I use OpenDNS and would recommend it.

Here&#039;s my article on the service: http://www.404techsupport.com/2010/02/10/opendns-pt-1-a-solution-to-many-problems/

NameBench just seemed to provide a note for OpenDNS because it didn&#039;t like the fact that you&#039;re redirected to their &quot;Couldn&#039;t Find&quot; page when you type in a non-existent URL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too have been investigating DNS for a post. Google Public DNS (though lacking many features) beat OpenDNS in 3 different environments where I tested it, but lacks any of the features beyond the infrastructure. I use OpenDNS and would recommend it.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s my article on the service: <a href="http://www.404techsupport.com/2010/02/10/opendns-pt-1-a-solution-to-many-problems/" rel="nofollow">http://www.404techsupport.com/2010/02/10/opendns-pt-1-a-solution-to-many-problems/</a></p>
<p>NameBench just seemed to provide a note for OpenDNS because it didn&#8217;t like the fact that you&#8217;re redirected to their &#8220;Couldn&#8217;t Find&#8221; page when you type in a non-existent URL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rarst</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-256669</link>
		<dc:creator>Rarst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freewaregenius.com/?p=4715#comment-256669</guid>
		<description>@Jason H

Hm? I was testing DNS for recent post and namebench gave OpenDNS first place on my connection.

If you get bad results maybe it does perform poorly on yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason H</p>
<p>Hm? I was testing DNS for recent post and namebench gave OpenDNS first place on my connection.</p>
<p>If you get bad results maybe it does perform poorly on yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason H</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-256649</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freewaregenius.com/?p=4715#comment-256649</guid>
		<description>Agreed. It throws a flag but if you know you&#039;re using OpenDNS, it should be safe to ignore.

Other things like NameBench are not fans of OpenDNS either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. It throws a flag but if you know you&#8217;re using OpenDNS, it should be safe to ignore.</p>
<p>Other things like NameBench are not fans of OpenDNS either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrree1</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2010/02/09/icsi-netalyzr-know-your-connection/comment-page-1/#comment-256647</link>
		<dc:creator>mrree1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 17:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freewaregenius.com/?p=4715#comment-256647</guid>
		<description>I dont think Netalyzr is a big fan of open dns</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont think Netalyzr is a big fan of open dns</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 481/482 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via fwgpullzone.freewaregeniusco.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.freewaregenius.com @ 2012-02-10 01:47:45 -->
