MetatOgger is a free, powerful program for tagging and renaming MP3s and other audio files. It offers the functions you would expect from a tag editor (e.g. mass renaming, tags from filenames or path, scripts to perform editing functions) as well as a few that are not so common, such as “acoustic fingerprinting” of unknown songs using the MusicBrainz database, built in album art search, importing lyrics from lyricwiki.org into your audio tags, and the ability to download a massive audio tag database that it can use as a tagging resource.
Applying the correct tags and cover art to your audio library may feel like a never ending quest or even an impossible one; fortunately, however, there are sophisticated tools such as MetatOgger to help with the task. I’d previously written about Mp3Tag, an excellent audio tagging and renaming app, but MetatOgger it notable because it has a couple of interesting functions that Mp3Tag does not, including acoustic fingerprinting and audio tag lookups via its own downloadable database.
This software has a lot of potential, but also needs to iron out some significant kinks. Here’s a list of some of the features that MetatOgger has that I like the most, as well as a list of those I do NOT like so much.
My favorite MetatOgger features (also known as the PROS section):
- Acoustic fingerprinting: is your recourse for audio files that has no information whatsoever (or simply for identifying missing info). Acoustic fingerprinting is a process whereby the software “listens” to the audio and compares its digital fingerprint with the huge Musicbrainz community database. MetatOgger can query this database on demand to instantly populate missing audio tags without user intervention.
Column-header filters: you can easily not notice that you can perform this really useful function (see image to the right). Would have liked the ability to filter by rules though, Excel-style, such as “all entries that begin with x”.- Tag from Database: this will prompt the downloading of a massive database which apparently comprises millions of titles. You can then simply do a search, find the album you want, and use the tags found in the database on your local files.
- Lyrics: simply check the songs you want and choose “get lyrics from lyricwiki.org” and voila – your songs will incorporate lyrics inside their audio tags. Useful for media players that offer a lyrics display with playback option.
- Cover art lookups: use the cover art search box to find cover art online. The program gives you a choice between storing the image data in the tag in the file itself, or otherwise to store it in the folder (if in doubt, go with the former). Note that you will need to manually identify the most suitable match from the list of results (the screenshot above shows cover art lookups).
- Allows saving workspaces: which is to say you can decide on which columns you would like to work with and their width on-screen and save that configuration. This turns out to be indespensible.
- Support for a wide range of audio files: including Ogg Vorbis, FLAC, Speex, MP3, Musepack, Windows Media, WavPack and Monkey’s Audio
- Preview changes: this is standard practice for apps of this sort, but I will mention anyway that the program allows you to fiddle around with your audio library to your heart’s content, and will only save the changes once you are good and ready and click “save”; until then everything is virtual and un-doable.
My not-so-favorite features (also know as the CONS section):
- The user experience: is not as friendly as it could have been, and may cause some degree of frustration before getting used to. It always takes me too many clicks to check/uncheck the files that I want to work with because it involves using too many right click commands.The various interventions, moreover, could definitely have been made more intuitive.
- It can be slow: navigating is somewhat slow, and saving changes can be slower than you’d at first expect.
- No search box: despite the coolness of column-header filtering, I was surprised that there was no overall filter/search box.
- Cover art: will at times not produce results that are nonetheless easily found in, say, a Google images search. The good news is that you can download these separately and point to them from within MetatOgger.
- No context menu entry: one of the things I like about Mp3Tag is that it adds a context menu entry whereby I can quickly right click on a bunch of audio files and load them into that app to edit their tags. I am wishing that MetatOgger had an equivalent.
The verdict: a very powerful tool that can be immensely useful. I especially like the “acoustic fingerprinting” option and to be quite honest would prefer to access the Musicbrainz database from this program that using Musicbrainz’ own “Picard” app (the latter being rather atypical in its interface and design).
If you are using Mp3Tag or another similar program and are happy with the way it works and feels and it is performing well for you then, you might get a sense that MetatOgger is somewhat clunky or that its not as smooth and intuitive as it could be. However, if you want the added functionality (acoustic fingerprinting, database lookups, lyrics lookups) then MetatOgger is certainly a very nice software to have, and that is why I am giving this one my highest “Freewaregenius Pick” award.
Version Tested: 3.9.1.0
Compatibility: Windows XP, Vista, Seven. Requires MS .NET Framework 3.5 SP1
Check out the MetatOgger page (in French, but click here for a Google English translation). The download link is in the blue box, (approx 5 megs).














Recently I heard about “acoustic fingerprinting” without knowing its name
, and I really find it like magic. My daughter has a role in his cell: where hears a song that sounds “in the air”, and returns the name of the topic, author, album cover, etc.
Holy crap this thing is terrible. Awkward interface but if it actually worked, that might be forgiven. It didn’t. And it’s not. And neither are you for suggesting this POS.
Wow. Can’t wait to delete your URL fast enough. Just as soon as I post this.
@OnepeeOd: Well I guess we can take heart in (a) your honesty, (b) your frankness, and (c) the fact that you won’t ever be back here again.
This software may not have worked for you, but it worked when I used it.
Works perfectly for me…I’ve never used tagging software like this and I must say I’m very impressed with it’s ability to quickly recognise and tag files, and then download the lyrics.
sorry man, MAJOR FAIL.
This piece of software is not ready for prime time AT ALL!
-It is painfully slow and unresponsive,
-it features no user feedback what so ever (you click on tag, and nothing happens so you don’t have any clue what the program is doing)
- it has crashed two times, when handling some 80 mp3s.
despite its linuxy UI, MusicBrainz has never had troubles like that.
I’m really really disappointed that you gave it a “FreewareGenious Pick” emblem. I should be revoked, and you should set your standards higher.
Sorry, huge disappointment. I used to trust you blindly. I won’t anymore.
@ sirotnikov Actually, the program is quite slow and unresponsive, but everyone’s PC is different. Samer might have a more high-end computer, so it’s not as unresponsive as you say on his PC.
As for me, I won’t try the program until it uses less resources, and I hate the fact that it requires .Net 3.5. I only have .Net 2.0, and I don’t want to install the massive .Net 3.5! All .Net programs suck actually. This program can be written in Java!
Where can I download this?
PESfan – Having a too powerful computer to notice bad performance is a bad excuse.
Notice I don’t blame Samer for that at all. Samer was honest when describing the cons. I don’t take exception with that.
My feeling is, however, that the cons are bad enough to outweigh the pros, completely, and the high score is unjustified. MetaOgger offers little improvements over MusicBrainz Piccard, which contrary to MetaOgger, works.
My computer is by no means old or poor performing. Samer himself admitted as much that the program is very slow. I tried MetaOgger several times on different groups of 70-100 files, and it stopped responding and then crashed repeatedly.
I think it’s clear, that despite promising features, the program is still very much in growing pains. It is evident (though not clear enough) in Samer’s own review.
I think it is an error of judgment to give it 5 stars and a pick, especially when another program does the main feature (acoustic fingerprinting) very well and does not share its incredible problems.
I assume that if you really recommend it, then it’s really that good. This certainly wasn’t the case.
Tried to download but no joy. Even tried downloading in French! Just took me back to the MetatOgger home page. Shame, could use the software.
The download link is in the blue square, the link text is “Le fichier d’installation de 5 Mo peut être téléchargé ici.”
http://www.luminescence-software.org/download/metatogger/MetatOGGer-Setup.exe
it should run in mono as all net application. at least thats the theory!