22 responses to “Ulteo Virtual Desktop: run a virtual Linux environment inside Windows”

  1. offhermeds

    Why not use free VMware Player at http://www.vmware.com/products/player with a free pre-built actual Linux OS applicance? Your favorite Linux flavor of course – see http://www.vmware.com/appliances/. Or JeOS, or gOS, or Solaris… looks like there are hundreds ready for download. Did I mention it’s all free?

  2. Joe

    If you don’t mind slightly slower-than-native performance, give QEMU-Puppy or DSL-Embedded a try. Neither supports deb or rpm packages, but each has a decent selection of available software, and you can add a Slackware installer to Puppy.

    Access to your windows folders requires a workaround, however – either network sharing or an ftp server.

  3. EP

    I’ll stick to VirtualBox…

  4. blaszta

    @offhermeds & EP

    Ulteo is much more like Paralles on Mac (where you can run native Windows application inside OS X). Please correct me if I’m wrong. With VMWare & VirtualBox, you need to load “the entire” OS to launch the app.

    The problem is: (IMHO) there’s no “killer” linux application that can’t be run on Windows. We already have GIMP, blender, and so on that can be run on Windows.

    Interesting, but not too usable (IMHO again).

  5. Rarst

    VirtualBox. Complete (actually VirtualBox is not complete, processor is not really virtualized unlike VirtualPC and others) virtualization does come with performance hit but doesn’t restrict what you can do, what flavour of linux you can install and what apps you put on top of it.

  6. Roman ShaRP

    VirtualBox with guest additions, which makes switching between host and guest system easier, seems pretty good to me.

    I’m not limited to one OS (I prefer Ubuntu though), I can have on “virtual HDD” as much virtual disk space as I want.

    I have read that CoLinux focuses on performance, but I have no complains about Virtualbox performance on my current system with AMD dual-core CPU and 2 Gb RAM.

  7. Z. Igorinsky

    VMWare is WAY too slow but it *does* work. Sun’s VirtualBox performance is great, but the Linux guest is a nightmare to configure for shared folders & USB (and the OSE VirtualBox doesn’t even attempt USB support). Linux is difficult enough to work with (what with having to drop into the terminal mode & issue a bunch of gibberish commands to do much of anything) without adding the virtualized problems.

    This, on the other hand, is a fairly clean solution.

  8. Reader Orin

    Hey Samer,

    How does this stack up against previously posted WUBI? Better or worse.

  9. Z. Igorinsky

    For me, the most painless approach for adding Linux to a windows box is Wubi, that adds a dual boot ubuntu using NTFS (so you don’t have to mess with repartitioning your drive). It recognized my existing Vista-XP dual boot and installed nicely without screwing anything up.

  10. Rarst

    >Linux guest is a nightmare to configure for shared folders & USB

    Not messed with USB but I configured folders pretty fast (Ubuntu guest) after carefully reading VirtualBox manual (and I am total noob in linux). Well it did make me remember hardcore DOS command line skills… :)

    Anyway in last VirtualBox version network-related stuff got great boost so it’s easier to simply make ftp server on host.

  11. darkkosmos

    Problem is that.. WHY would I want to use linux in the first place?!!??!

  12. Guy Fawkes

    Why would you not be able to use the sudo command to run dpkg? Did you try?

  13. Hiram Q. Pustule

    @darkkosmos: Geek cred.

  14. orLinux

    andLinux
    http://www.andlinux.org/
    Provides similar setup using Ubuntu and coLinux.
    This provides huge amount of easy to install applications using Synaptic Package Manager.

  15. tux_Nub

    IMHO vmware much faster than virtualbox
    example of using linux in windows (i’m used) is for webserver/web application testing stuff [apache+php+mysql] that generally run on linux….

    the only linux that i love is slax
    http://www.slax.org/get_slax.php
    good for recovery rescue cd. ;^^

  16. pSz

    ” # I tried, in fact, to install a program using dpkg -i as mentioned above but was not successful; I got a message that I did not have “superuser privileges”. ”

    @Samer: are you sure, you tried to run dpkg in with root privileges (sudo)?

  17. sayno2politics

    Hey genius,

    Post a political ad and lose customers.

    I was seriously interested in your product, but not in your agenda. No, no you can’t.

  18. Mothman

    @Orin
    How does this stack up against previously posted WUBI? Better or worse.

    I’d say Wubi FTW. Pretty easy to set up, and won’t have performance issues as opposed to virtualization.

  19. Dimension-X

    I have VirtualBox. I’ll try this one too. Thanks.
    A virtual OS will give you almost bulletproof security from malware, worms and viruses when browsing the net as they can’t get into your ‘real’ host machine.
    Another possible use is as a testing environment.

Leave a Reply


+ 1 = four