<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IOBit SmartDefrag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/</link>
	<description>Freeware reviews and downloads, featuring the coolest, best free software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:29:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The DataRat</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/comment-page-1/#comment-258043</link>
		<dc:creator>The DataRat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/#comment-258043</guid>
		<description>.

I gave-up DiskKeeper for Smart Defrag and have never looked back !

And, yes, background (constant) defragmentation has to be tough on a hard drive.
Not to mention unnecessary.

I use the &quot;Deep Optimization&quot; option on Smart Defrag usually once daily on my
64-bit Vista machine, my 32-bit Vista machine, and my XP netbook. Other folks
defrag once/week and it suffices for them.

.

The PC Rat

.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
<p>I gave-up DiskKeeper for Smart Defrag and have never looked back !</p>
<p>And, yes, background (constant) defragmentation has to be tough on a hard drive.<br />
Not to mention unnecessary.</p>
<p>I use the &#8220;Deep Optimization&#8221; option on Smart Defrag usually once daily on my<br />
64-bit Vista machine, my 32-bit Vista machine, and my XP netbook. Other folks<br />
defrag once/week and it suffices for them.</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>The PC Rat</p>
<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/comment-page-1/#comment-105422</link>
		<dc:creator>s</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/#comment-105422</guid>
		<description>My laptop harddisk was 335 fragmented.

Smartdefrag has brought it down to 11%.

Going to single digit soon..

This user friendly tool is a must have</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My laptop harddisk was 335 fragmented.</p>
<p>Smartdefrag has brought it down to 11%.</p>
<p>Going to single digit soon..</p>
<p>This user friendly tool is a must have</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Groo</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/comment-page-1/#comment-12828</link>
		<dc:creator>Groo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/#comment-12828</guid>
		<description>I have used it for a few . If u put auto defrag on it will bring ur Optimization Level to 100.  it wants u to use all its functions is all</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used it for a few . If u put auto defrag on it will bring ur Optimization Level to 100.  it wants u to use all its functions is all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teqjack</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/comment-page-1/#comment-5804</link>
		<dc:creator>teqjack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 May 2007 19:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/#comment-5804</guid>
		<description>I also use &quot;Power Defragmenter&quot; 
 
http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-Disk-Utils/Power-Defragmenter.shtml 
 
which is a GUI front-end for `Contig by Sysinternals` because it allows defragging at folder, or even single file, levels - works well (more successfully as well as more quickly) on my 18Gig folders instead of my 200Gig drive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also use &#8220;Power Defragmenter&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-Disk-Utils/Power-Defragmenter.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.softpedia.com/get/System/Hard-Disk-Utils/Power-Defragmenter.shtml</a> </p>
<p>which is a GUI front-end for `Contig by Sysinternals` because it allows defragging at folder, or even single file, levels &#8211; works well (more successfully as well as more quickly) on my 18Gig folders instead of my 200Gig drive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: flashkiller</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/comment-page-1/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>flashkiller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 02:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/#comment-326</guid>
		<description>Doesn&#039;t Linux constantly defrags HDs?

Wait,...nm

Anyways I don&#039;t see how that&#039;s bad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t Linux constantly defrags HDs?</p>
<p>Wait,&#8230;nm</p>
<p>Anyways I don&#8217;t see how that&#8217;s bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carbonize</title>
		<link>http://www.freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/comment-page-1/#comment-274</link>
		<dc:creator>Carbonize</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 17:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://freewaregenius.com/2007/01/09/iobit-smartdefrag/#comment-274</guid>
		<description>As far as I can see constantly defragging your hard drive cannot be a good thing. I&#039;d think this would seriously reduce the life of your HD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I can see constantly defragging your hard drive cannot be a good thing. I&#8217;d think this would seriously reduce the life of your HD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic (Feed is rejected)
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/10 queries in 0.021 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 483/484 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via fwgpullzone.freewaregeniusco.netdna-cdn.com

Served from: www.freewaregenius.com @ 2012-02-10 01:07:26 -->
